Modernity looks different after reading Subaltern Silence. Traditionally imagined as a project of liberation—underpinned by the rise of the free press and the growth of the public sphere—Olson’s analysis upends this understanding. His meticulous and self-reflexive archival work reveals how liberation and publicity have long been conjoined to domination and silence. A new dialectic of enlightenment emerges: not only reason but speech and discursive presence may shirk their liberatory promise. Through a deeply interpretive engagement with colonial and post-colonial archives—especially those surrounding Haiti’s revolution and postcolonial trajectory—Olson investigates how subordination operates not only through literal voicelessness but through misrepresentation—a strategy that renders individuals unheard, devalued, and erased. The book invites readers and researchers to think about and study voices that are absent in the archives, challenging us to confront how history is told and who is left out. While firmly grounded in historical inquiry, Subaltern Silence resonates powerfully in the present. Its discussion of misrepresentation as a method of silencing remains urgent in light of ongoing struggles over voice, recognition, and power and is a valuable contribution to critical theory and political thought. 

Born This Way invites readers to unpack what has become a widespread social “fact”: the belief that sexual and gender identities are biologically innate. Through careful historical analysis, Wuest reveals how this framework emerged in the 1950s and 1960s as LGBTQ+ activists turned to mental health professionals to challenge the pathologization of homosexuality, forging a path that intertwined identity claims with emerging scientific authority. Demonstrating how the scientization of sexuality can be a double-edged sword—enabling acceptance and alliance while also opening the door to politically dangerous forms of essentialism and scapegoating—  Born This Way bridges the politics of identity and political economy, laying bare the ideological stakes of claiming biology as destiny.

Osman Balkan’s Dying Abroad: The Political Afterlives of Migration in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2023) presents a fascinating ethnography of the oft-overlooked transnational implications of migrant deaths, and how those living outside of their birth countries—along with their families—navigate complicated, border-crossing end-of-life issues. Based on in-depth fieldwork in atypical sites (such as funeral homes) and with uncommon interlocutors (such as undertakers) in Berlin and Istanbul, Balkan provides a cogent analysis of the meanings associated with transnational deaths and movements of bodies among Germany’s large Turkish diaspora, as well as how these meanings relate to broader questions concerning identity and belonging. This timely work makes for especially compelling reading during our contemporary age of mass migration, and reveals in nuanced fashion how today’s debates concerning immigration also shape what Balkan refers to as the “afterlives” of immigrants, as well as the lived realities of their next of kin (both at home and abroad). The impressive fieldwork on which Dying Abroad is based also inflects the book’s writing, which is deeply reflexive and includes field notes and a discussion of the author’s positionality. It is the committee’s pleasure to present this year’s Charles Taylor Award to this powerful and politically important “ethnography of transnational deathways,” which makes clear contributions to the interpretivist tradition.  

In Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life  (Princeton University Press, 2023), Asad L. Asad provides a phenomenological account of the lives of undocumented immigrants, delineating how they experience—and the meanings they ascribe to—various forms of surveillance. Drawing from in-depth interviews and ethnographic research, Asad provides a nuanced account of why the undocumented do not simply “evade” state institutions, but also, at different moments, find it advantageous to “engage” with them. The text itself is layered with ethnographic writing and insights—for example, from an immigration court—while the methodological appendix includes a thoughtful discussion of the author’s positionality vis-à-vis his interlocutors. As this well-researched and clearly argued ethnographic work usefully highlights how interpretive approaches can contribute to our understanding of complex and politically salient topics, the committee is pleased to recognize Engage and Evade with the Honorable Mention for this year's Charles Taylor book award.

States of Subsistence is a journey that leaves the reader sensing the smell of khubz ‘arabi and pondering how the state is performed in Jordan and beyond. Through an ethnographic study of subsidized bread, Martínez pursues “the conundrums that come with being governed by something we can feel, hear, smell, and discuss, but never see” (5). He works at bakeries, interviews policymakers, and spends time with average citizens to understand how subsidized bread is entangled with weighty issues of state authority. Drawing on this long-term immersion, the book shifts attention from the institutions and events that have dominated the study of bread politics to the routines of food production and distribution as sensory rituals connecting citizens to the state. Taking bread and bakeries as an analytical vantage point, Martínez shows how political subjectivities are shaped through embodied relationships to the state, and how the state itself is “a set of relations and practices that must be constantly renewed” (12). States of Subsistence is a pertinent example of how systematic engagement with the ordinary can lead to unexpected yet profound insights, demystifying that most consequential abstraction in political thought and life—the state.

Freedom Inside? is a deeply careful and caring book, humanizing the lived experiences of those subject to the systemic injustices of mass incarceration. In this unique ethnographic study of yoga and meditation in U.S. prisons, Godrej asks whether yogic traditions as they are taught in prisons pacify the incarcerated to accept their lot or urge them to resist the penal system’s messaging. Embedding herself in volunteer organizations teaching yoga and meditation in prisons, with the rare access to the incarceration system that this entailed, Godrej arrives at a more surprising and complex answer than that suggested by the binary of political passivity versus resistance. She argues that yoga practices foster dignity and internal strength for practitioners behind bars, enabling them to “pursue forms of inward-oriented spiritual pursuit denied (or possibly unknown) to many people in society” (278). This insight is developed through close engagement with the voices and ideas of those who have experienced confinement and those who volunteer to teach them yoga, making Freedom Inside? a model of the co-production of knowledge between the author and interlocutors. Through an immersive, embodied, and consistently self-reflexive examination, this book makes profound contributions to our understanding of personhood in incarceration and internal dimensions of resistance, as well as to interpretive ethnographic methods. Freedom Inside? speaks to audiences beyond academia, demonstrating both the potential and the limits of self-care practices in “total institutions” of social control.

Mobilizing in Uncertainty is a model of clear and impactful interpretive social science. It leads the reader into the anguished processes by which ordinary citizens decide whether to take up arms, take sides, hide or flee a coming war, through a sociohistorical study of mobilization during the Georgian-Abkhaz War of 1992-1993.

Bread and Freedom is a remarkable book. It brings alive the profound uncertainty and myriad aspirations that people living through times of radical political upheaval experience, and the ways such lived contingency becomes forgotten as unruly realities tamed through narratives of fait accompli.

In this meticulously researched book, Diana Kim asks: why did Western colonial powers, which had long profited from the Southeast Asian trade in opium, opt to shut it down?

Focusing on Indigenous people’s struggles against settler colonial rule, Theft is Property! is at once a genealogy of dispossession and an effort to highlight and engage with Indigenous scholarship and activist work from the nineteenth century to the present.

The book is a tour de force. Combining both archival and ethnographic methods masterfully, Riofrancos’ book stands out for its sophisticated treatment of a topic of abiding concern to political science, namely the study of resource politics. But unlike conventional accounts, Riofrancos refocuses our attention onto the field of political struggle.

South Africa is often heralded as a beacon of successful transition into democracy; yet its citizens are riddled with anxiety and insecurity, often taking to vigilantism in order to protect themselves including from the state itself. Why would citizens feel this way, especially given the fact that South Africa has a constitution with one of the most robust set of rights’ protections in the world?

Wedeen’s ethnography focuses on the case of Bashar Al Asad’s Syria, capturing the excitement and anxiety of the revolutionary aspirations that animated the uprising of 2011 followed by the complex trajectory of resistance and complacency that developed once a brutal civil war took hold.

In this dramatic reimagining of discussion of ethnographic methods as a conversation among a cast of ethnographers brought together for an ethnographic trial, Among Wolves transcends the limitations of writing a methods book in both content and form.

Fujii debunks common myths about interviews and makes us see constraints, limitations, mistakes and the resistance of subjects as “gifts” that can enhance one’s research, instead of liabilities that one must accommodate or patch over.

Through his detailed empirical “sociological portrait” of bordering practices on the US borders with Mexico and Canada, Longo successfully challenges notions of borders as “thin and vertical” lines between sovereign territories.

This concise, sophisticated book presents an imaginative reinterpretation of the body politic in international relations theory. It engages with new materialism literature and interpretive methodology by displacing realist international relations metaphors that are rooted in Eurocentric conceptions of power.

Grounded Authority is well poised to engage in broader debates about Indigenous resistance across settler colonies. Pasternak foregrounds jurisdiction and disentangles it from sovereignty while visualizing jurisdiction as a density of lines against orthodox notions of hierarchy and scale.

When the State Meets the Street is well written and provides a rich, detailed and nuanced ethnography of the state by focusing on street-level bureaucracy at the frontlines of public service. The book builds from findings and an ethnographic sensibility to inform political theorizing about bureaucratic polities.

Everyday Exposure is an interesting, surprising and outstanding text offering an exceptional interpretive analysis that takes the questions of environmental justice for the 850 Anishinabek people in the Aamjiwnaang Reserve, or Sarnia Reserve 45, in Canada's so-called Chemical Valley and makes it “home”.